Statistical and Comparative Analysis of Spectral Index Combinations for Burned Area Detection

Resumo

With the advancement of technologies such as Big Data and Artificial Intelligence, an increasing number of medium and high spatial resolution satellite images are being made available for free, enabling environmental studies. The integration of well-established methodologies, such as the use of spectral indices for detecting burned areas, with machine learning techniques, continues to contribute to the implementation of impact mitigation strategies and contingency plans for these events. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the performance of different combinations and logical operations between spectral indices for detecting burned areas (NBR, NBR2, MIRBI) and the Near-Infrared (NIR) band, using 2019 Landsat OLI sensor images. To achieve this, we tested 44 combinations of the indices mentioned above and spectral band, along with their temporal differences, using "OR" and "AND" operations, with combinations ranging from two to three indices, including all indices with and without temporal differences. Initially, we classified the burned areas and subsequently used the 2019 burned area mapping by the Labgama team at UFAC [2] as reference data. We used this data to generate 900 stratified random points, with 200 in non-burned areas and 700 in burned areas, to evaluate the resulting classifications [1]. We created 44 confusion matrices and, for each one, calculated the performance metrics: i) Overall Accuracy, ii) Precision, and iii) Recall, in order to identify which approaches performed best in detecting burned areas, both in forested and agricultural areas, and to assess the distribution of these metrics. As a result, we have Figure 1, which displays the violin plots showing the distribution of the performance metric values (Accuracy, Recall, and Precision). Analyzing the violin plots, we observe that Precision has higher values, concentrated near 1, while Recall shows greater dispersion and lower values, indicating the model’s difficulty in detecting all burned areas. On the other hand, accuracy has an intermediate distribution, with a central tendency between 0.25 and 0.75 and an average of around 0.50. [...]